Online Exams

Tap a star to rate

Online Exams is a browser-based exam management platform for institutions that run their own tests: schools setting class tests and term exams, colleges and universities moderating department exams, coaching institutes selling mock test series, and corporate or certification teams running skill checks. It is a tool for the L&D, training or school team that puts candidates through an assessment, and for the coaching institute that sells practice papers to students. The site's address block names the company as Logical Software, at Nandini Spring Field, Manjari Farm, Pune, Maharashtra. The home page reports 150+ institutions running exams on the platform, 50,000+ candidate exams delivered to date, and "10+ yrs running exam days for education teams". Its headline promise is "Exam day, without the chaos": allocate candidates, watch every attempt live, and publish results the same afternoon.

How an exam runs, from building the paper to results

The home page breaks the work into four steps on one platform: build, allocate, watch and publish.

Build. Teachers pull questions from the bank, tag topics, set the rules once and reuse the paper the following term. The smart question bank lets a team reuse, tag and version every question it has written, with passages, images and bulk upload included, so an institution can bring an existing library of questions in rather than retyping it. The exam builder covers sections, timing, negative marking and instructions. For a school, the page says class tests and term exams are something "teachers can set without training".

Allocate. Administrators assign groups, time windows and access tokens in one bulk action instead of one candidate at a time. This is the step the site leans on hardest: a slide on the home page shows 524 candidates on one board, handled by two staff. For colleges and universities the platform adds department-wide allocation, moderation and approval before results go out.

Watch. While the exam runs, a live board shows attempts, camera checks and tab-switch flags. The live monitoring feature is described as showing "who is in, who is stuck, who needs a reset". The sample operations panel on the home page shows the kind of view an invigilator gets: a count of candidates attempting (477 in the example) and flagged (12), a candidate list with statuses such as "Face lost", "Tab switch" and "Clear", and a timeline of events such as identity verified, a second face in frame, full-screen kept, and finally "Submitted, log sealed". A severity budget counter ("3 of 10 used") sits beside it.

Publish. Objective answers score themselves. Written answers go to reviewers, then to a moderator, then out to candidates, so a second pair of eyes checks the marking before a result is released. Results go out with the analysis attached.

Proctoring and evidence

The integrity section is headed "Proof, not suspicion". The page says every flag is a timestamped event with a photo behind it, so a disputed result becomes a conversation about evidence rather than opinion. The listed controls are face and gaze checks, tab-switch detection, full-screen lock, identity capture and activity log export. The FAQ describes the proctoring workflows as webcam checks, suspicious activity signals, tab-switch indicators, candidate activity logs and review-ready evidence for admins. For corporate and certification exams the site promises "evidence attached to every result", which is the feature a certification body needs when a candidate appeals. A separate security page is linked from the footer under the name "Security & DPDP", and the home page points visitors who need secure exams to proctoring and audit controls.

Selling paid test series

Coaching institutes get a monetization layer. The paid test series feature covers packages, payments, enrollments and renewals, and the coaching solution adds rank lists and topic-level analysis on top of paid mock series. The home page's sample dashboard shows what this looks like in rupees: "Collected this month" with a sample total of ₹6,42,300, a "NEET Full Mock" package of 12 tests with 318 enrolled at ₹1,499, and a "Banking Prelims Sprint" with 204 enrolled at ₹899. These are sample figures on a sales page rather than plan prices, and they show that the platform handles a priced catalog of mock series and tracks enrollment per package. The site's blog writes for the same audience, with posts on preparing for the SSC CGL exam with online practice tests, the mental side of sitting exams, and how to choose good practice tests.

One of the testimonials on the home page speaks to this directly. Amol Patil writes: "The paid test series gave our students a clear practice path, and gave us enrolment and rank data we simply did not have before."

Analytics and reports

The analytics section is pitched as "Reports a teacher will actually read" and "Not a spreadsheet dump". It promises to show which students slipped, which questions were badly written, and which topic the whole cohort missed. The listed reports are student-wise performance, question difficulty analysis, rank and score distribution, and exportable reports for review meetings. Question difficulty analysis is the part that feeds back into the question bank: a badly written question can be fixed before the paper is reused next term.

Integrations and the student app

The API and imports feature covers student import, result export and LMS hooks, so a roster can come in from an existing system and results can go back out. The home page names no specific LMS or school system. Students have an Android app, which the site says lets them take practice tests, sit exams and check results on a phone, and there is a separate student exam access link in the footer.

Who uses it

The home page carries three testimonials. N Niranjan of CIPET Bhubaneswar writes: "Setting a term paper used to take three teachers and a week of coordination. One person builds it from the question bank now, and results are out the same afternoon." V Vikrant Sir of GPC Seraj writes: "Allocating 500 candidates across branches was the part that always went wrong. It is one action now, and we can watch every attempt while the exam runs." Together with the coaching testimonial above, they cover the three uses the site sells hardest: building papers, allocating large groups, and running a paid test series. The FAQ confirms the platform supports exam creation, scheduling, candidate allocation, proctoring, evaluation, reports and paid test series workflows for schools, colleges and coaching institutes.

Trial, demo and pricing

The home page lists no plan prices; its pricing section is on a separate page. What it does lay out is the path in. Visitors can book a demo, run a live demo, or start a free trial, which the footer describes as a way to "Create exams and test the workflow." The FAQ says individuals can start with the free trial path and move to institution or enterprise discussions when candidate volume, analytics, branding, proctoring or integration needs grow. The demo offer is concrete: "Bring a paper you already run. We will set it up on the call and you can watch it go live." Institution-scale requirements go to a sales contact, and the footer links a refund policy. Support is reachable by phone and by email at the addresses printed in the footer.

Who it suits

Online Exams suits a school, college or coaching institute that wants to move paper exams online and needs one place to build papers, allocate hundreds of candidates, watch them live and publish moderated results. Coaching institutes that sell mock series for competitive exams get the most distinctive part, a priced test series with enrollments, renewals and rank lists. Certification teams that need a photo and timestamp behind every flag will find the evidence model useful. It is an exam platform rather than a course platform: the pages describe question banks, proctoring, evaluation and reporting, and say nothing about hosting video lessons or course content, so an institution that wants teaching and testing in one product will pair it with a separate LMS through the import and export hooks.

More in Quiz and Assessment Tools

See all